Evidence for biofilm treatment in chronic wounds: narrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17058/reci.v16i.20139Keywords:
Wounds and Injuries, Gram-Positive Bacteria, Gram-Negative Bacteria, Bacterial Adhesion, Wound HealingAbstract
Background and Objectives: Microbial load predicts failures in chronic wound treatment. The objective was to investigate the available evidence on biofilm treatment in chronic wounds in adults. Content: Narrative review using descriptors such as “Treatment” and “Biofilm” in searches across major databases from February to July 2024, including articles from the last 10 years, excluding preclinical studies, and ensuring quality with the SANRA checklist. The initial search identified 1,323 articles, of which 780 were excluded. After screening, 21 articles were read in full, resulting in the inclusion of 11 in the review. Conclusion: The study demonstrates the effectiveness of therapeutic approaches for treating biofilms in chronic wounds. Surfactant-based dressings with silver sulfadiazine proved effective, especially when applied early. The AQUACEL™ Ag+ dressing showed promising results in chronic venous ulcers, and olive oil extract of C. oestroides emerged as an alternative for refractory patients. Microbial load was identified as a predictor of treatment failures, while fluorescence imaging and antibiofilmogram technology improved antimicrobial management. Surfactant-based gel shows contradictory results in bacterial community and cadexomer iodine reduces microbial load although without statistical significance in healing. Limitations such as sample sizes and lack of methodological rigor indicate the need for further research.
Downloads
References
1. Werdin F, Tenenhaus M, Rennekampff HO. Chronic wound care. Lancet Lond Engl. 29 de novembro de 2008;372(9653):1860–2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61793-6
2. Oliveira AC de, Rocha D de M, Bezerra SMG, Andrade EMLR, Santos AMR dos, Nogueira LT. Qualidade de vida de pessoas com feridas crônicas. Acta Paul Enferm. 2019;32:194–201. DOI https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0194201900027
3. Goswami AG, Basu S, Banerjee T, Shukla VK. Biofilm and wound healing: from bench to bedside. Eur J Med Res. 25 de abril de 2023;28(1):157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023-01121-7
4. Bedin LF, Busanello J, Sehnem GD, Silva FM da, Poll MA. Strategies to promote self-esteem, autonomy and self-care practices for people with chronic wounds. Rev Gaúcha Enferm. 2014;35:61–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2014.03.43581
5. Costa JAS da, Pitella CQP, Lopes APR, Caetano LC de O, Santos KB. Conhecimento Dos Enfermeiros Sobre Tratamento De Feridas Crônicas Na Atenção Primária À Saúde. Rev Enferm Atual Derme. 7 de fevereiro de 2022;96(37):e-021199. Disponível em: https://revistaenfermagematual.com.br/index.php/revista/article/view/1282
6. Vieira CP de B, Araújo TME de. Prevalence and factors associated with chronic wounds in older adults in primary care. Rev Esc Enferm U P. 20 de dezembro de 2018;52:e03415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2017051303415
7. Malone M, Schwarzer S, Radzieta M, Jeffries T, Walsh A, Dickson HG, et al. Effect on total microbial load and community composition with two vs six-week topical Cadexomer Iodine for treating chronic biofilm infections in diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J. dezembro de 2019;16(6):1477–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13219
8. Cortez DN, Moraes JT, Ferreira IR, Silva EL, Lanza FM. Costs of treating skin lesions in Primary Health Care. Estima – Braz J Enteros Ther [Internet]. 2019;17. Disponível em: https://www.revistaestima.com.br/estima/article/view/824.
9. Flemming HC, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol. setembro de 2010;8(9):623–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2415
10. Diban F, Di Lodovico S, Di Fermo P, D’Ercole S, D’Arcangelo S, Di Giulio M, et al. Biofilms in Chronic Wound Infections: Innovative Antimicrobial Approaches Using the In Vitro Lubbock Chronic Wound Biofilm Model. Int J Mol Sci. 5 de janeiro de 2023;24(2):1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24021004
11. Koyanagi H, Kitamura A, Nakagami G, Kashiwabara K, Sanada H, Sugama J. Local wound management factors related to biofilm reduction in the pressure ulcer: A prospective observational study. Jpn J Nurs Sci JJNS. abril de 2021;18(2):e12394. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12394
12. Omar A, Wright JB, Schultz G, Burrell R, Nadworny P. Microbial Biofilms and Chronic Wounds. Microorganisms. 7 de março de 2017;5(1):9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms5010009
13. Kim D, Namen Ii W, Moore J, Buchanan M, Hayes V, Myntti MF, et al. Clinical Assessment of a Biofilm-disrupting Agent for the Management of Chronic Wounds Compared With Standard of Care: A Therapeutic Approach. Wounds Compend Clin Res Pract. maio de 2018;30(5):120–30. Disponível em: https://www.hmpgloballearningnetwork.com/site/wounds/article/clinical-assessment-biofilm-disrupting-agent-management-chronic-wounds-compared-standard
14. Su Y, Yrastorza JT, Matis M, Cusick J, Zhao S, Wang G, et al. Biofilms: Formation, Research Models, Potential Targets, and Methods for Prevention and Treatment. Adv Sci Weinh Baden-Wurtt Ger. outubro de 2022;9(29):e2203291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202203291
15. Kennedy P, Brammah S, Wills E. Burns, biofilm and a new appraisal of burn wound sepsis. Burns J Int Soc Burn Inj. fevereiro de 2010;36(1):49–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2009.02.017
16. Eriksson E, Liu PY, Schultz GS, Martins-Green MM, Tanaka R, Weir D, et al. Chronic wounds: Treatment consensus. Wound Repair Regen Off Publ Wound Heal Soc Eur Tissue Repair Soc. março de 2022;30(2):156–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12994
17. Soldevila-Boixader L, Mur I, Morata L, Sierra Y, Rivera A, Bosch J, et al. Clinical usefulness of quantifying microbial load from diabetic foot ulcers: A multicenter cohort study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. julho de 2022;189:109975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109975
18. Zölß C, Cech JD. Efficacy of a new multifunctional surfactant-based biomaterial dressing with 1% silver sulphadiazine in chronic wounds. Int Wound J. outubro de 2016;13(5):738–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12361
19. Tang J, Guan H, Dong W, Liu Y, Dong J, Huang L, et al. Application of Compound Polymyxin B Ointment in the Treatment of Chronic Refractory Wounds. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. setembro de 2022;21(3):320–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734620944512
20. Harding KG, Szczepkowski M, Mikosiński J, Twardowska-Saucha K, Blair S, Ivins NM, et al. Safety and performance evaluation of a next-generation antimicrobial dressing in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers. Int Wound J. agosto de 2016;13(4):442–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.12450
21. Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 5 de dezembro de 2016;5(1):210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
22. Vitsos A, Tsagarousianos C, Vergos O, Stithos D, Mathioudakis D, Vitsos I, et al. Efficacy of a Ceratothoa oestroides Olive Oil Extract in Patients With Chronic Ulcers: A Pilot Study. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. setembro de 2019;18(3):309–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734619856143
23. Jacob A, Jones LM, Abdo RJ, Cruz-Schiavone SF, Skerker R, Caputo WJ, et al. Lights, fluorescence, action-Influencing wound treatment plans including debridement of bacteria and biofilms. Int Wound J. outubro de 2023;20(8):3279–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14208
24. Sotto A, Laurent F, Schuldiner S, Vouillarmet J, Corvec S, Bemer P, et al. Evaluation of the Use of Antibiofilmogram Technology in the Clinical Evolution of Foot Ulcers Infected by Staphylococcus aureus in Persons Living with Diabetes: A Pilot Study. J Clin Med. 17 de dezembro de 2021;10(24):5928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245928
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Miriam Viviane Baron, Julia Braga-da-Silveira, Sandra de Oliveira Thomé, Carolina Gonçalves Pinheiro, Andrielle Dias Pinheiro, Ryana Karla Ferreira Paulino, Raissa Gabriella Mota Vieira de Carvalho, Maria Edmeia Lopes de Oliveira, Paulline Paiva Mendes de Souza

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must state that the paper is original (has not been published previously), not infringing any copyright or other ownership right involving third parties. Once the paper is submitted, the Journal reserves the right to make normative changes, such as spelling and grammar, in order to maintain the language standard, but respecting the author’s style. The published papers become ownership of RECI, considering that all the opinions expressed by the authors are their responsibility. Because we are an open access journal, we allow free use of articles in educational and scientific applications provided the source is cited under the Creative Commons CC-BY license.