Asociación de Quick Sofa y Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica con mortalidad en pacientes sépticos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17058/reci.v15i2.19543Resumen
Justificación y Objetivo: la sepsis, una condición que pone en riesgo la vida, requiere identificación temprana. La escala Quick Sofa puede contribuir a identificar el riesgo de sepsis en pacientes admitidos en el servicio de emergencias. Sin embargo, estos puntajes y criterios necesitan ser ampliamente evaluados antes de implementarse en la práctica clínica. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo evaluar la asociación entre el puntaje Quick Sofa y los criterios del Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica con la mortalidad en pacientes sépticos críticos de un hospital universitario. Métodos: estudio observacional retrospectivo que incluyó a 614 pacientes mayores de 18 años ingresados en la unidad de cuidados intensivos debido a sepsis o shock séptico. Resultados: no se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre las puntuaciones de Quick Sofa o Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica entre los sobrevivientes y los no sobrevivientes. Los pacientes con un puntaje Quick Sofa ≥2 presentaron asociación con el desarrollo de shock séptico (p=0,00). Los pacientes con una puntuación ≥2 en los criterios de Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica mostraron una asociación estadísticamente significativa con una estancia en la unidad de cuidados intensivos por más de 72 horas (p=0,013). Conclusión: los puntajes y criterios evaluados no se asociaron con la mortalidad en pacientes sépticos. Las altas tasas de mortalidad y la incidencia de shock séptico destacan la necesidad de herramientas más eficaces para el diagnóstico temprano de sepsis.
Descargas
Referencias
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour C, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;395(10219):200–11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7.
World Health Organization. Global report on the epidemiology and burden of sepsis [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240010789
Fleischmann-Struzek C, Mellhammar L, Rose N, et al. Incidence and mortality of hospital- and ICU-treated sepsis: results from an updated and expanded systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(8):1552–62. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06151-x.
Machado FR, Cavalcanti AB, Bozza FA, et al. The epidemiology of sepsis in Brazilian intensive care units (the Sepsis PREvalence Assessment Database, SPREAD): an observational study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(11):1180–9. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30322-5.
Fernando SM, Tran A, Taljaard M, Cheng W, Rochwerg B, Seely AJE, et al. Prognostic accuracy of the quick sequential organ failure assessment for mortality in patients with suspected infection. Ann Intern Med. 2018;168(4):266–75. doi: 10.7326/M17-2820.
Pires HHG, Neves FF, Pazin-Filho A. Triage and flow management in sepsis. Int J Emerg Med. 2019;12(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12245-019-0252-9.
Rudd KE, Seymour CW, Aluisio AR, et al. Association of the quick sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score with excess hospital mortality in adults with suspected infection in low- and middle-income countries. JAMA. 2018;319(21):2202–11. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.6229.
Gendreau S, Frapard T, Carteaux G, et al. Geo-economic influence on the effect of fluid volume for sepsis resuscitation: a meta-analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024;209(5):517–28. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202309-1617OC.
La Via L, Sangiorgio G, Stefani S, et al. The global burden of sepsis and septic shock. Epidemiologia. 2024;5(3):456–78. doi: 10.3390/epidemiologia5030032.
Raith EP, Udy AA, Bailey M, et al. Prognostic accuracy of the SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among adults with suspected infection admitted to the intensive care unit. JAMA. 2017;317(3):290–300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
Qiu X, Lei YP, Zhou RX. SIRS, SOFA, qSOFA, and NEWS in diagnosing sepsis and predicting adverse outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2023;21(8):891–900. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2023.2237192.
Sreekanth A, Jain A, Dutta S, et al. Accuracy of quick sequential organ failure assessment score & systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria in predicting adverse outcomes in emergency surgical patients with suspected sepsis: a prospective observational study. Cureus. 2022;14(7):e26560. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26560.
Jiang J, Yang J, Mei J, et al. Head-to-head comparison of qSOFA and SIRS criteria in predicting the mortality of infected patients in the emergency department: a meta-analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018;26(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0527-9.
Machado FR, Cavalcanti AB, Monteiro MB, et al. Predictive accuracy of the quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment score in Brazil: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201(7):789–98. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201905-0917OC.
Safari S, Shojaee M, Rahmati F, et al. Accuracy of SOFA score in prediction of 30-day outcome of critically ill patients. Turk J Emerg Med. 2016;16(3):146–50. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2016.09.005.
Machado FR, Ferreira EM, Schippers P, et al. Implementation of sepsis bundles in public hospitals in Brazil: a prospective study with heterogeneous results. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1858-z.
Song JU, Sin CK, Park HK, et al. Performance of the quick sequential (sepsis-related) organ failure assessment score as a prognostic tool in infected patients outside the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):1–13. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-1952-x.
Branco MJC, Lucas APM, Marques RMD, et al. The role of the nurse in caring for the critical patient with sepsis. Rev Bras Enferm. 2020;73(4):e20190031. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0031.
Warstadt NM, Caldwell JR, Tang N, Mandola S, Jamin C, Dahn C. Quality initiative to improve emergency department sepsis bundle compliance through utilisation of an electronic health record tool. BMJ Open Quality [Internet]. 2022 Jan 6;11(1):e001624. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001624
Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Medicine [Internet]. 2021 Oct 2;47(11):1181–247. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00134-021-06506. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005337.
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Vanessa Frighetto Bonatto, Jaqueline Sangiogo Haas, Miriane Melo Silveira Moretti; Arianne dos Santos Gomes; Rafael Barbarena Moraes, Gilberto Friedmann, Karina Azzolin

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
The author must state that the paper is original (has not been published previously), not infringing any copyright or other ownership right involving third parties. Once the paper is submitted, the Journal reserves the right to make normative changes, such as spelling and grammar, in order to maintain the language standard, but respecting the author’s style. The published papers become ownership of RECI, considering that all the opinions expressed by the authors are their responsibility. Because we are an open access journal, we allow free use of articles in educational and scientific applications provided the source is cited under the Creative Commons CC-BY license.