Antonomastic anthroponyms in the context of the 2022 Brazilian presidential elections: An analysis under Cognitive Linguistics

Authors

  • Luan Oliveira Mendes Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana
  • Natival Almeida Simões Neto Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v50i99.20509

Keywords:

Cognitive Linguistics, Cognitive Onomastics, Brazilian Politics, Alternative Names, Occasional Formations, Anthroponymy, Anthroponomastics

Abstract

This study presents an investigation grounded in Cognitive Linguistics and Cognitive Semantics (Lakoff & Johnson, 2002; Geeraerts, 2006; Evans & Green, 2006; Lakoff, 2008; Kövecses, 2010) on the use of alternative names attributed to Brazilian politicians in contexts of party-electoral polarization, with a focus on the conceptual metaphors and metonymies found in occurrences of antonomasia. Antonomasia is understood as the use of a common noun in place of a proper name, reflecting ideological and identity-based framings (Garcia, 2006; Martins, 2021). The analysis is situated within Cognitive Onomastics and examines comments posted on the social network X/Twitter between August and December 2022, a period marked by the presidential elections. Designations such as Ex-Presidiário, Bolsomito, Tchutchuca do Centrão, and Carluxo were analyzed, with the names of Lula and Bolsonaro being the most frequently targeted. The most recurring metaphors were HUMAN BEING IS ANIMAL and HUMAN BEING IS MYTHOLOGICAL CREATURE, while the most common metonymies were of the PART FOR WHOLE type. The analysis revealed the use of prejudiced discourse, such as machismo and LGBTQIA+phobia, by both sides of the political spectrum, highlighting ideological contradictions in attack strategies. The study concludes that nicknames function as cultural artifacts that reflect ideological frames, intensify polarization, and reveal the crucial role of language in constructing political identities in contemporary Brazil.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Natival Almeida Simões Neto, Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)

    .

References

EVANS, Vyvyan; GREEN, Melanie. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Mahwah, NJ and Edinburgh. 2006.

GARCIA, Othon Moacyr. Comunicação em prosa moderna. 26. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV, 2006.

GEERAERTS, Dirk. Introduction: A rough guide to Cognitive Linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, p. 1–28, 2006. doi:10.1515/9783110199901.1

KÖVECSES, Zoltan. Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford university press, 2010.

LAKOFF, George; JOHNSON, Mark. Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago press, 2008.

MARTINS, Ana Lúcia M. R. Poltronieri. ANTONOMÁSIA: DEFINIÇÕES E CRÍTICA. Caderno Seminal, Rio de Janeiro, v. 37, n. 37, 2021. DOI: 10.12957/seminal.2021.59229. Disponível em: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/cadernoseminal/article/view/59229. Acesso em: 30 jun. 2025.

SIMÕES NETO, N. A.; RODRIGUES, L. S. Antropônimos esporádicos no português do Brasil: o caso das construções [MC X]N (Nonce anthroponyms in Brazilian portuguese: the [MC X]N constructions case). Estudos da Língua(gem), [S. l.], v. 21, n. 1, p. 83-109, 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.22481/el.v21i1.10356

SOLEDADE, Juliana. Recuperando a história do léxico antroponímico brasileiro. LABORHISTÓRICO, v. 6, p. 465-483, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.24206/lh.v6i3.35110

ULLMANN, Stephen. Semântica: uma introdução à ciência do significado. Tradução de Mateus e J. A. Osorio. 2. ed. Lisboa: Calouste-Gulbenkian, 1967.

Published

2025-10-14

How to Cite

Antonomastic anthroponyms in the context of the 2022 Brazilian presidential elections: An analysis under Cognitive Linguistics. (2025). Signo, 50(99), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v50i99.20509