All roads lead to semantic frames: how Fillmore’s frame theory became the quiet backbone of cognitive linguistics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17058/signo.v50i99.20507Keywords:
Cognitive Linguistics, Grammar, Frame Semantics , Encyclopedic semanticsAbstract
This paper reflects on the centrality of Frame Semantics (Fillmore, 1982, 1985) within the Cognitive Linguistics movement. It argues that Fillmore’s theory has become a conceptual bedrock for Cognitive Linguistic theories, especially due to its comprehensive and systematic account of embodied, encyclopedic semantics. First, it retraces the origins of Frame Semantics back to Case Grammar before shifting to a more cognitive and usage-based model. The article then revisits the trajectory of Fillmore’s Frame Semantics, from its earliest formulations, showing how it has become a strong and influential model for investigating meaning in empirical research contexts. Finally, it provides examples of Frame Semantics’ influence on other theoretical models, strongly shaping how linguists understand meaning, grammar, and conceptualization.
Downloads
References
BAKER, C. F.; LORENZI, A. Exploring crosslinguistic frame alignment. In: INTERNATIONAL FRAMENET WORKSHOP 2020. Proceedings… Marseille: European Language Resources Association, 2020. p. 77-84. Retrieved from: https://aclanthology.org/2020.framenet-1.10/. Accessed: 26 jun. 2025.
BERTOLDI, A.; CHISHMAN, R. Frame Semantics and Legal Corpora Annotation: Theoretical and Applied Challenges. Linguistic Issues in Language Technology (LiLT), v. 7, 2012. Retrieved from: https://journals.colorado.edu/index.php/lilt/article/view/1277/1111. Accessed: 26 jun. 2025.
BOAS, H. C.; DUX, R. Semantic Frames for Foreign Language Education: Towards a German frame-based online dictionary. Veredas, v. 17, n. 1, 2013. Retrieved from: https://periodicos.ufjf.br/index.php/veredas/article/view/25406. Accessed: 26 jun. 2025.
BURCHARDT, A.; PENNACCHIOTTI, M.; THATER, S.; PINKAL, M. Assessing the impact of frame semantics on textual entailment. Natural Language Engineering, v. 15, n. 4, p. 527-550, 2009.
COULSON, S. Semantic leaps. Frame-shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
CRUSE, A. A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press, 2006.
DUFFLEY, P. Linguistic Meaning Meets Linguistic Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
EVANS, V.; GREEN, M. Cognitive linguistics: an introduction. Edimburgo: Edinburgh University Press, 2006.
FAUCONNIER, G. Mental Spaces. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1985.
FAUCONNIER, G. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
FAUCONNIER, G. Mental spaces. In: GEERAERTS, D.; CUYCKENS, H. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. p. 351-376.
FAUCONNIER, G.; TURNER, M. Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive science, [s.l.], v. 22, n. 2, p. 133-187, 1998.
FAUCONNIER, G.; TURNER, M. The Way We Think: conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books, 2002.
FILLMORE, C. J. The case for case. In: BACH, E.; HARMS, R. T. (Org.) Universals in linguistic theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968. p. 1-88.
FILLMORE, C. J. An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In: COGEN, C. et al. (Eds.). Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1975. p. 123-31.
FILLMORE, C. J. Frame semantics and the nature of language. In: CONFERENCE ON THE ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 1976, New York. Proceedings… New York: New York Academy of Sciences, 1976. p. 20-32.
FILLMORE, C. J. Frame Semantics. In: THE LINGUISTICS SOCIETY OF KOREA (Org.). Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul: Hansinh Publishing Co., 1982, p. 111-137.
FILLMORE, C. J. A private history of the concept ‘frame’. In: DIRVEN, R.; RADDEN, G. (Eds.) Concepts of Case. Tübingen: Narr, 1987.
FILLMORE, C. J. Discussing frame semantics: the state of the art. An interview with Charles Fillmore. Interviewer: József Andor. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, Amsterdam, v. 8, n. 1, p. 157-176, 2010.
FILLMORE, C. J., ATKINS, B. T. S. Toward a Frame-based Lexicon: The Semantics of RISK and its Neighbors. In: LEHRER, A.; KITTAY; E. (Eds.). Frames, Fields and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 1992. p. 75-102.
FILLMORE, C. J.; BAKER, C. A frames approach to semantic analysis. In: HEINE, B.; NARROG, H. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. p. 313-339.
FILLMORE, C. J.; JOHNSON, C. R.; PETRUCK, M. R. L. Background to FrameNet. International Journal of Lexicography, Oxford, v.16, n.3, p. 235-250, 2003. Available at: ijl.oxfordjournals.org/content/16/3/235.full.pdf. Date retrieved: 20 Jun. 2025.
FILLMORE, C. J., KAY, P.; O'CONNOR, M. C. Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone. Language, [s.l.], n. 64, 1988. p. 501-538.
GARGETT, A.; LEUNG, T. Building the Emirati Arabic FrameNet. In: INTERNATIONAL FRAMENET WORKSHOP 2020. Proceedings… Marseille: European Language Resources Association, 2020. p. 70-76. Retrieved from: https://aclanthology.org/2020.framenet-1.10/. Accessed: 26 jun. 2025.
GEERAERTS, D. A Rough Guide to Cognitive Linguistics. In: GEERAERTS, D. (Ed.). Cognitive Linguistics: basic readings. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2006, p. 1-28.
GIOULI, V.; PILITSIDOU, V.; CHRISTOPOULOS, H. Greek within the Global FrameNet Initiative: challenges and conclusions so far. In: INTERNATIONAL FRAMENET WORKSHOP 2020. Proceedings… Marseille: European Language Resources Association, 2020. p. 48-55. Retrieved from: https://aclanthology.org/2020.framenet-1.7/. Accessed: 26 jun. 2025.
GOFFMAN, E. Frame Analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974.
GOLDBERG, A. E. Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995.
GRADY, J. E. Metaphor. In: GEERAERTS, D.; CUYCKENS, H. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. p. 188-213.
JURAFSKY, D. Charles Fillmore. Computational Linguistics, Cambridge, v. 40, n. 3, p. 725 731, 2014. Available at: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/COLI_a_00201. Date retrieved: 20 Jun. 2025.
KÖVECSES, Z. Language, mind and culture. A practical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.
LAKOFF, G.; JOHNSON, M. Metaphors we live by. London: The University of Chicago Press, 1980.
LANGACKER, R. W. Foundations of cognitive grammar: theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.
LANGACKER, R. W. Cognitive Grammar: a basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
MATSUMOTO, Y. Frame Semantics. In: FRIED, M.; NIKIFORIDOU, K. (Eds.). The Cambridge Handbook of Construction Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2025.
MINSKY, M. A framework for representing knowledge. In: WINSTON, P. H. (Ed.). The psychology of computer vision. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1981. p. 211-277.
MIRANDA, N. S.; MACHADO, N. S. Polaridades, intensidades e desencontros: uma construção superlativa de estados absolutos. Linha D'Água, São Paulo, v. 27, n. 1, p. 117-137, jun. 2014. Available at: https://revistas.usp.br/linhadagua/article/view/77940/84825. Date retrieved: 25 Jun. 2025.
MONDADA, L.; DUBOIS, D. Construção dos objetos de discurso e categorização: uma abordagem dos processos de referenciação. In: CAVALCANTI, M. M. et al. Referenciação. São Paulo: Contexto, 2003. p. 17-52.
NEUMAIR, P. A.; GEHRECKE, F. M.; HARTMANN, S.; ZIEM, A. A frame-semantic approach to conceptual metaphors in the domain of emotion. Language and Cognition, [s.l.], n. 17, p. 1-18, 2025.
OHARA, K. Finding corresponding constructions in English and Japanese in a TED Talk parallel corpus using Frames-and-Constructions analysis. In: INTERNATIONAL FRAMENET WORKSHOP 2020. Proceedings… Marseille: European Language Resources Association, 2020. p. 8-12. Retrieved from: https://aclanthology.org/2020.framenet-1.2/. Accessed: 26 jun. 2025.
PONTI, E. M.; O’HORAN, H.; BERZAK, Y.; VULIC, I.; REICHART, R.; POIBEAU, T.; SHUTOVA, E.; KORHONEN, A. Modeling language variation and universals: a survey on typological linguistics for Natural Language Processing. Computational Linguistics, v. 45, n. 3, 2019.
SAG, I. A.; BOAS, H. C.; KAY, P. Introducing Sign-Based Construction Grammar. In: BOAS, H. C.; SAG, I. A. (Ed.). Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Berkeley: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 2012.
ROSCH, E. Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, [s.l.], v. 4, n. 3, p. 328-350, 1973.
TURNER, M. Conceptual integration. In: GEERAERTS, D.; CUYCKENS, H. (ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. p. 377-393.
VAN DIJK, T. A. Analyzing frame analysis: A critical review of framing studies in social movement research. Discourse Studies, v. 25, n. 2, p. 153-178, 2023.
VEREZA, S. “Metáfora é que nem...”: cognição e discurso na metáfora situada. Signo, Santa Cruz do Sul, v. 38, n. 65, p. 2-21, jul. dez. 2013. Available at: https://online.unisc.br/seer/index.php/signo/article/download/4543/3204. Date retrieved: 13 Jun. 2025.
VEREZA, S. Mal comparando…: os efeitos argumentativos da metáfora e da analogia numa perspectiva cognitivo-discursiva. SCRIPTA, Belo Horizonte. 20, n. 40, p. 18 35, jul./dez. 2016. Available at: http://periodicos.pucminas.br/index.php/scripta/article/view/13964. Date retrieved: 9 dez. 2017.
ZIEM, A. Frames of understanding in text and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors publishing with Signo retain the copyright to their work, licensing it under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows articles to be re-used and re-distributed without restriction, as long as the original work is correctly cited. Signo is owned by Associação Pró-Ensino em Santa Cruz do Sul and also hosts the Open Journal System plataform. Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
